Preventing and Deterring Election Manipulation by Elected Officials
- Manipulation at the Federal Level
- Manipulation at the State Level
- Case Documents
Free, fair, and regular elections are the cornerstone of democracy. But elections cannot be free and fair when one of the candidates meddles with the rules or unfairly tilts the playing field in his or her favor. In recent years, there have been alarming incidents of state and federal elected officials exercising improper influence in their own election contests.
This abuse of power threatens the integrity of our electoral process and strikes at the heart of American democracy. Protect Democracy is committed to preventing election manipulation by elected officials and has taken concrete action to preserve free and fair elections across the country.
Manipulation at the Federal Level
Manipulation at the State Level
Secretaries of state wield significant power in the administration of elections, which can open the electoral process to abuse. In Kansas, Secretary of State Kris Kobach sparked an ethics crisis when he initially refused to recuse himself from overseeing the recount of the 2018 gubernatorial contest between himself and incumbent governor.
That same year, Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp, who was also running for governor, purged voters from the state’s voter rolls, froze 53,000 voter registration applications, and used the official secretary of state website to accuse his opponents, without evidence, of trying to hack the state’s voting system. Protect Democracy sued and forced Secretary Kemp to step down. (Read more about Brown v. Kemp.)
Improper influence in elections is not only possible for secretaries of state, as demonstrated in 2018 when Florida Governor Rick Scott instructed a state police agency that he oversaw to investigate county election officials for “rampant fraud” during his campaign for U.S. Senate. Governor Scott also conducted a press event for his campaign from the official governor’s residence and refused to recuse himself from the panel with responsibility for certifying election results – including the results of his own race for U.S. Senate – until Protect Democracy sued to stop the abuses. (Read more about League of Women Voters Florida v. Scott.)
These kinds of conflicts of interest can arise across the country. Protect Democracy will continue to fight to ensure that elected officials running for office do not unduly influence election outcomes.
Bipartisan coalition letter in support of Security from Political Interference in Justice Act of 2019
Congress is right to scrutinize charges of voter suppression in Georgia
Originally published by The Hill
April 19, 2019