The judiciary and court orders

An independent judiciary is one of the Constitution’s most essential safeguards. Federal courts serve as the check against unlawful abuses of executive power — the forum where constitutional rights are vindicated and where no one, not even the president, is above the law. That check only works if the executive branch respects and complies with court orders.

Our Constitution relies on the judicial branch to serve as a check against unlawful abuses of executive power. Threats to defy the courts or efforts to bully judges jeopardize the foundational checks and balances that protect our rights, our economy, our communities, and our safety. Those threats are no longer hypothetical. The cases in which the administration has defied the courts have resulted in individuals deported without due process, congressionally appropriated funds improperly withheld, and federal employees wrongfully terminated.

Defiance disguised as compliance

The specious legal arguments and delay tactics employed by the President’s Justice Department are forms of “legalistic noncompliance” — using legal language and procedures to mask the defiance of court orders happening behind closed doors. This enables the president to say he is complying, when his administration is in fact pushing boundaries and eroding constitutional checks one “slice of the salami” at a time. Identifying and exposing this pattern is essential to holding the executive accountable.

Intimidation of the judiciary

Members of the Trump administration have called for impeachment of judges who rule against the administration, refused to rule out defying court orders, and dismissed the authority of district courts. Noncompliance with court orders threatens the fundamental idea that no one is above the law, and these actions threaten the public’s trust in courts, their rulings, and the judicial branch as a whole.

An escalating and documented crisis

The scale of noncompliance is now a matter of record. A Washington Post analysis of more than 160 lawsuits found that the Trump administration has been accused of flouting courts in roughly one third of the cases in which a judge issued a substantive ruling — a pattern legal experts describe as suggesting widespread noncompliance with America’s legal system. In a single month, a Minnesota federal judge documented 96 violations of court orders by ICE in his district in January 2026 alone — more, the judge noted, than some federal agencies accumulate in their entire existence.

Explore this work