Defending the Rule of Law

Our Work

In the 21st Century, democracies tend to die by the erosion of democratic norms and guardrails rather than at the barrel of a gun.

Why Is This Important

Would-be authoritarians often abuse their power, using it to eliminate checks and balances, quash dissent, target already marginalized communities, and deepen political divisions.

The Constitution and the laws we have built around it provide tools to constrain authoritarian behavior. But many of the norms and guardrails that help define our democracy are not written into law and are not self-enforcing. Together these restraints must be exercised (and strengthened) to prevent government officials from abusing their power and to ensure the law applies equally to everyone, from the most powerful to the least.

The kinds of outcomes we seek

  1. Uphold the principle that nobody is above the law.
  2. Ensure accountability for those who have attacked or undermined our democracy — regardless of their political standing.
  3. Ensure meaningful checks and balances on executive power.
  4. Stop abuses that target marginalized groups and their ability to participate in democracy.
  5. Protect the ability of the public and the press to voice dissenting views.
  6. Protect independent, non-politicized law enforcement and civil servant workforces.

What Impact Have We Had

Secured a nationwide injunction blocking border wall construction without congressional approval and helped enact power of the purse legislation to ensure future presidents cannot circumvent Congress.

Helped prevent a sitting president from politicizing the Department of Justice to interfere in an election, in part through a multi-year campaign organizing thousands of Department of Justice alumni.

Impact in the News

Illustration of handcuffs and the White House.

Survey finds cross-partisan opposition to January 6 pardons

The survey found broad opposition to the proposition of pardoning those convicted of crimes related to the events of January 6, with 59 percent of voters opposing pardons for January 6 generally.

June 25, 2024

  • Defending the Rule of Law
  • Analysis
An image of Donald Trump's signature on a bill.

The impoundment threat, explained

Trump’s position is wrong. There is no inherent power to impound.  The history of presidential impoundments make this clear. 

June 13, 2024

  • Defending the Rule of Law
  • Analysis
Departments of Veterans Affairs Flag

The civil service, explained

The civil service is the civilian workforce of the U.S. federal government, currently numbering about 2.2 million employees.

June 11, 2024

  • Defending the Rule of Law
  • Analysis
Donald Trump in the Oval Office.

Trump’s Schedule F plan, explained

In October 2020, the Trump Administration issued an executive order that would have stripped protections from civil servants perceived as disloyal.

June 11, 2024

  • Defending the Rule of Law
  • Analysis
Donald Trump with flags behind him.

Checking the Pardon Power: Areas of Abuse

To determine whether a president abuses the pardon power requires assessing whether a pardon violates constitutional provisions or principles and thus upsets the constitutional order.

April 11, 2024

  • Defending the Rule of Law
  • White Papers
Illustration of handcuffs and the White House.

Checking the Pardon Power

This paper reviews an array of limitations on the presidential pardon power.

April 11, 2024

  • Defending the Rule of Law
  • White Papers