Deborah Apau is a research specialist dedicated to supporting Protect Democracy’s mission of creating a truly representative democracy.
How does Gen Z really feel about democracy?
- April 6, 2025
Insights from three profiles of youth and democracy

Young Americans represent both the present and future of political leadership and participation in the United States. Understanding the nuanced views and perspectives of this demographic, including their unique political attitudes and behaviors, is critical to bolstering democratic institutions and safeguarding against the risks of democratic decline.
In a new report in partnership with CIRCLE (the Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement), Protect Democracy published findings from a national survey of young Americans that challenge common assumptions about how they perceive democracy, engage with civic life, and see their role in shaping the future.
The findings challenge the notion that young Americans think and behave as a monolith by offering clearer insights into youth’s perceptions of, and relationships to, democratic principles and practices. In doing so, we pinpoint key strengths and challenges that can inform interventions that will help all young people value, support, and strengthen democracy.
Read the findings. Download the full report. Read the findings.
Appreciation, Detachment, and Dissatisfaction: Three profiles of attitudes toward democracy among Gen Z
Our data, from an exclusive nationally representative poll of young people, highlights the political views and behaviors of three groups of youth with different profiles of attitudes about democracy in the United States.
Each profile is based on young people’s beliefs and perspectives on six facets of democracy:
Principles of democracy
Importance of protecting civil rights
Justifiability of political violence
Support for bipartisan cooperation
Experience of affective polarization
Confidence in democracy
There were no major differences between the profiles in age, gender, rurality, party affiliation, and both voter turnout and presidential vote choice in the 2024 election.

Key Takeaways
1. There are no major demographic differences among profiles.
Our analysis found no significant differences between the profiles in age, gender, rurality, party affiliation, and both voter turnout and presidential vote choice in the 2024 election. This challenges assumptions about which groups of young people are more or less supportive of democracy, indicating that attitudes toward democracy cut across the political and demographic spectrum within Gen Z.
2. Across the board, young people believe in democratic principles.
Young Americans broadly support core principles of democracy.
81%
agree or strongly agree on the importance of having elected leaders chosen in free and fair elections
80%
agree or strongly agree that fair laws and equal treatment of all people are essential.
Nearly 70%
of youth say that elected leaders should not be able to go above the law, that the government should not limit First Amendment freedoms, that it’s essential to have different views represented in politics, and that elected leaders should represent the views of the people they represent.
Only 11%
believe that it political violence is sometimes necessary to achieve progress.
3. Despite a strong belief in democratic principles, confidence in democracy is low.
While young Americans support the core principles of democracy, their confidence in its practice is low.
Among Gen Z, there is a widespread lack of confidence in how democracy is actually functioning today. Many feel that the system is not meeting their needs or expectations, leading to disengagement, frustration, or even a willingness to explore extreme measures to address their concerns.
The gap between belief in democratic ideals and dissatisfaction with its current practice highlights the urgent need for reform and greater responsiveness within democratic institutions.
Maintaining and strengthening democracy requires engagement from young people … Simply supporting ‘democracy as is’ may not be enough to make democracy stronger for tomorrow.
4. Civic engagement and support matter.
Youth with lower levels of civic engagement, media literacy, and access to resources tend to be the most skeptical of democracy, and to express the most support for authoritarian tactics as an alternative.
Those who feel disconnected from democratic institutions or processes, or who lack the tools and resources necessary to actively participate in them, are more likely to lose trust in the system’s ability to meet their needs, creating an openness to non-democratic alternatives that may seem more promising.
Socioeconomic inequality and race play a critical role in amplifying these attitudes, as our analysis indicates that BIPOC youth, youth from lower-income backgrounds, and those with limited access to education and civic resources are disproportionately represented in profiles with more dismissive views of democracy.
Read the report: How does Gen Z really feel about democracy? Read the report: How does Gen Z really feel about democracy?
5. Identity also matters.
Our analysis finds that while experiences of affective polarization and the fear of being the victim of political violence do not necessarily lead to support of authoritarian tactics, they can drive youth toward more extreme views of how to achieve reform, including support for political violence.
This remains true even when youth possess ‘protective factors’ such as comparably high educational attainment, incomes, political efficacy, and media literacy, indicating that physical safety and security, particularly as it relates to matters regarding identity, can be paramount in shaping youth attitudes towards tactics for reform.
Our analysis highlights how identity, and how concerns about safety and well-being related to identity (such as gender identity or sexual orientation), plays a significant role in shaping attitudes towards democracy and the best ways to reform it.

Our partner
To learn more about youth and democracy, visit our partner at CIRCLE (Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement) at Tufts University.
VISIT WEBSITERelated Content
It can happen here.
We can stop it.
Defeating authoritarianism is going to take all of us. Everyone and every institution has a role to play. Together, we can protect democracy.
Donate
Sign Up for Updates Sign Up for Updates
Explore Careers Explore Careers
How to Protect Democracy How to Protect Democracy