On Jan. 20, Protect Democracy represented 41 retired generals, admirals, and service secretaries in an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to oppose the administration’s attempt to punish the speech of Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly and chill other veterans from sharing their views in public. The core speech at issue involved Senator Kelly’s recitation of a fundamental and well-known principle of military law — that service members need not obey orders that they know are unlawful. 

The Constitution protects the right to speak on issues of public concern, and this “is no less true when the speaker is a retired member of the military,” the retired national security leaders noted in their brief. “In fact, quite the opposite. By virtue of their service, retired members of our armed forces have a distinct perspective and specialized expertise that contributes uniquely to the public discourse. They also populate all walks of public life, including holding elected public office — like Senator Kelly — and other prominent civic roles. To chill the speech of retired military service members would not only infringe on their individual First Amendment rights, but also impoverish public debate on critical issues relating to our military and its role in domestic and foreign affairs.”

These retired leaders recognized the dangerous chilling effects already created by the Secretary’s retaliatory approach in this case — and the courage required to speak up nonetheless. “[T]he mere fact of the submission of this brief, may be viewed with disfavor by the Secretary,” they wrote. “This decision is not made lightly: the attempt to punish Senator Kelly suggests that public expressions of disagreement with the Secretary — even if made in good faith and supported factually — invite possible retaliation. Indeed, [brief signatories] are aware of many fellow veterans who would eagerly participate in public debate on important and contested issues, but are declining to do so today, fearing official reprisal. This chilling effect risks silencing public dissent from those who served in uniform — a critical ingredient in American self-governance dating back to those who fought for and won our independence.”

Featured press

Ex-military leaders back Mark Kelly in lawsuit against Hegseth

Jan. 20, 2026

Read more

Dozens of former military leaders defend Mark Kelly in Pentagon fight

Jan. 20, 2026

Read more